Securing our data’s authenticity has become quite the challenge in today’s era of smart living. Living in smart homes and cities has made life convenient. Still, the complex web of the Internet of Things (IoT) and the Internet of Everything (IoE) pose a constant security concern, even with the use of complex passwords.
One approach to ensuring the safety of individuals and connected devices is the adoption of multi-factor authentication, a vital step in reinforcing security in the face of evolving threats.
Managing the security of vast and intricate systems requires efficient and powerful solutions. In this context, the significance of employing advanced security measures cannot be overstated.
The complexities of modern living demand foolproof security, making it necessary to explore innovative ways to address these challenges.
The Internet of Things (IoT) has permeated every conceivable field or application, giving rise to the ecosystem known as cyber-physical systems (CPS). This integration of IoTs has paved the way for cyber-physical systems, employing computing, communication, and control to usher in the next generation of engineered systems and technologies.
Over the past decade, cyber-physical systems have seen unexpected developments, presenting both opportunities and challenges. Threats, challenges, and critical issues have emerged, particularly in ensuring the security of CPS.
The diverse nature of the foundational components of CPS, whether in natural gas systems, transportation, or other automated domains, compounds the security dilemma.
CPS finds applications in various sectors, including energy, transportation, the environment, and healthcare. This article looks at the multifaceted problems that associates of the CPS domain need to address. It discusses the pressing issues that require resolution and offers a partial survey of critical research topics.
A cyber-physical system (CPS) is like a tech-savvy brain that combines the digital and physical worlds. It’s a sophisticated computing system that comfortably integrates hardware, software, networking, and real-world processes to keep a close eye on, control, and engage with the physical environment.
In a CPS setup, sensors and actuators act as the eyes and hands, collecting data from the real world—things like temperature, pressure, or location. This data then takes a digital journey through embedded computing systems, where it undergoes processing and analysis.
The magic happens when the system, based on this analysis, makes quick decisions and takes action. Mind you, this isn’t slow pondering; it often occurs in real time, influencing or managing the physical processes at play.
The real beauty of CPS lies in its ability to enhance interaction and communication through computational intelligence. It’s like boosting technology, pushing it to break its limits and achieve feats we might not have thought possible.
CPS is the tech expert bridging the digital and physical gap, opening up new horizons for what technology can achieve.
Cyber-physical systems (CPS) bring together various technologies like sensing, computation, control, and networking, linking them to physical objects and infrastructure and ultimately connecting them to the internet and each other. These systems are everywhere in our daily lives, spanning across different domains, such as:
CPSs are IT systems that infiltrate real-world applications, embedding sensors and actuators within them. As advancements in ICT (information and communication technology) continue, the communication between the cyber and physical worlds intensifies, facilitating more significant interaction among physical processes.
The applications of CPS are vast and growing, with sectors like energy, transportation, and healthcare increasingly relying on them. One notable example is the supervisory control and data acquisition system (SCADA), which is crucial in critical infrastructures (CIs) such as smart grids and industrial control systems (ICSs).
Now, let’s look into a few representative applications of CPS:
ICS, including SCADA and distributed control systems, optimize control and production while overseeing various industries such as nuclear plants, water and sewage systems, and irrigation. These systems utilize controllers such as programmable logic controllers (PLCs) equipped with a range of capabilities to achieve desired outcomes.
Also Read: The Complete Guide to OT SOC
Sensors and actuators link these devices to the physical world, with both wireless and wired communication options available. ICS can efficiently monitor and control operations from a centralized control center connected to PC systems.
While traditional power grids have been around for decades, smart grids represent the next generation of electricity generation with advanced functionalities. At the local level, smart grids empower consumers to better manage their energy usage, both economically and environmentally.
On a national scale, they improve control over emissions, global load balancing, and energy conservation.
The fusion of cyber and physical capabilities has revolutionized medical devices, aiming to enhance healthcare services. These devices, whether implanted inside the body (implantable medical devices) or worn as wearables, boast smart features and wireless communication capabilities.
Programmers facilitate communication for updating and reconfiguring these devices. Wearable devices are particularly useful in tracking patients’ activities.
Smart vehicles are designed to be environmentally friendly, fuel-efficient, safer, and more user-friendly. They rely on a network of 50–70 interconnected computers called electronic control units (ECUs), responsible for monitoring and regulating various functions such as engine emissions, brakes, entertainment, and comfort features.
These innovations are crucial for addressing contemporary challenges like traffic congestion and accidents.
Some more applications of CPS are
CPS proves its worth in agriculture by leveraging sensors and intelligent machinery like tractors and harvesters. These tools gather crucial data on soil conditions and types, empowering farmers to make well-informed decisions about crop management.
Integrating CPS into aeronautics yields benefits in enhancing aircraft safety, control, and overall efficiency. This technology paves the way for more innovative aviation systems, ensuring safer and more efficient air travel experiences.
Cyber-physical systems contribute to civil infrastructure enhancement by incorporating advanced digital technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and sensors. These innovations boost infrastructure efficiency, ensuring improved functionality and resource management.
In the manufacturing sector, CPS is used to oversee and regulate production processes in real-time. This real-time monitoring not only enhances product quality but also minimizes waste and boosts overall efficiency in manufacturing operations.
CPS brings about advancements in transportation by enhancing safety and efficiency through intelligent traffic management systems, vehicle-to-vehicle communication, and the integration of self-driving vehicles. These developments aim to create a safer and more streamlined transportation network for the future.
Extending cyber-physical systems to environmental monitoring involves deploying sensors and connected devices to collect data on air and water quality, climate conditions, and biodiversity. This data aids in better understanding and tackling environmental challenges.
The concept of smart cities includes incorporating CPS to elevate urban living standards. This encompasses intelligent infrastructure, automated public services, and data-driven decision-making for more effective city planning and management.
CPS can be utilized in education to establish smart classrooms, leveraging technology to enhance the learning experience. This includes interactive educational tools, adaptive learning systems, and real-time student performance monitoring.
These diverse applications underscore the versatility of cyber-physical systems across various domains. They offer solutions to a gamut of challenges and drive technological advancements for the prosperity of society.
CPS security boasts a range of unique characteristics that distinguish it from traditional systems. Let’s understand some of the critical features of CPS:
These features collectively contribute to the unique and advanced capabilities of cyber-physical systems, paving the way for innovative solutions and advancements in various domains.
CPS embodies a fusion of human, machine, and material elements, aiming to extend human control over time and space.
CPS differs from embedded systems by integrating physical devices and computing technologies. This integration transforms the nature of computation, shifting from digital to analog, discrete to continuous, static to dynamic, and distributed to unified.
Also Read: How to get started with OT security
CPS facilitates dynamic reorganization and integration within the same network, control, and embedded systems.
In comparison to IoT, CPS places greater emphasis on real-time, dynamic information control and service provision once physical entities have achieved perception.
Contrary to software systems, CPS prioritizes real-time control and feedback of each physical process. It accentuates dynamic responses in information processing and interaction.
CPS has revolutionized our interaction with the physical world, finding applications in crucial sectors like smart grids, traffic control, and environmental management.
In smart grid implementation, the key lies in seamlessly integrating sensor technology with the power system, effectively merging physical and information systems to form new industrial frameworks. However, ensuring information security is extremely crucial for the successful application of CPS.
To meet the rigorous demands of information security in CPS, several essential requirements have been identified:
A) Data Confidentiality: Ensuring that sensitive information remains confidential during transmission and storage, safeguarding it against unauthorized access.
B) Information Integrity: Preventing unauthorized modification of data or resources, as any compromise in integrity could lead to fraudulent activities.
C) Availability: Guarantee that the CPS system delivers necessary services when required. A high-availability CPS system should automatically handle hardware failures, system updates, and emergencies to maintain uninterrupted service provision.
D) Authentication: Verifying the true identity of communicating parties during the communication process is particularly crucial in preventing unauthorized access and ensuring data authenticity in cross-domain and cross-network scenarios.
E) Non-repudiation: Ensuring that all participants in the communication process cannot deny their actions or commitments. This involves utilizing information source evidence to prevent denial of sent information and to verify acceptance by the recipient.
F) Privacy Protection: Safeguarding user privacy and security, distinguishing between personal information and behavioral data. Different privacy protection technologies are employed to protect user information from unauthorized access and misuse by malicious entities.
Due to its inherent high sensitivity, reliability, and connectivity characteristics, CPS boasts significantly enhanced safety performance compared to conventional internet systems.
Particularly in network information exchange, CPS communication spans across various networks, necessitating consideration of security risks associated with diverse network connections.
For instance, when utilizing cloud computing networks as the background network, corresponding cloud computing security risks must also be taken into account.
Broadly, CPS security can be categorized into two main areas: infrastructure security and information security.
Within different CPS systems, a variety of infrastructure components, such as sensors, routers, servers, and protocols, play crucial roles in ensuring the system’s smooth operation.
Consequently, security threats may arise in the form of physical damage, equipment failure, line failure, electromagnetic interference, and internal threats.
Given CPS systems’ high sensitivity to the physical environment, it is essential to design systems with potent security measures to reduce these risks effectively.
Information security threats within CPS systems can be classified into three levels: the physical layer, the information layer, and the application control layer.
Physical layer threats encompass node capture, denial-of-service attacks, node control, passive attacks, clock synchronization attacks, crash attacks, exhaustion attacks, unfair competition, eavesdropping, tampering, and interference.
Information layer threats includel , authentication attacks, cross-network attacks, routing attacks, malicious code, distributed denial of service (DoS), user privacy disclosure, control network DoS attacks, flood attacks, error path selection, and tunnel attacks.
Application control layer threats comprise control command forgery attacks, perceptual data tampering attacks, control network DoS attacks, resonant attacks, viruses, Trojans, cloud computing service threats, and vulnerability attacks.
Recognizing and addressing these diverse threats is crucial for safeguarding the integrity and security of CPS systems.
This section explores cyber, cyber-physical, and physical attacks on various CPS applications, outlining the damages inflicted on CPS systems and strategies to mitigate them.
Publicly known attacks are relatively rare, and pinpointing the exact cause immediately can be challenging. Attacks are categorized based on their impact areas. Cyber-attacks that bypass sensors or actuators fall under the “cyber” category, while attacks targeting physical components are termed “physical.”
Cyber-physical attacks, on the other hand, disrupt physical components through cyber means. However, this concept is only partially novel, particularly in industrial control systems.
Also Read
Several countries have experienced terror attacks and extortion attempts through physical means. Cyber-attacks emerge as a natural progression, offering speed, affordability, distance independence, and ease of execution and management.
Various cyber and physical attacks on CPS systems include:
Notably, the “Stuxnet” attack in 2010 caused substantial damage to several nuclear plants in Iran. Moreover, recent cyberattacks by hackers from the United States have targeted Iran, illustrating two distinct types of attacks on industrial control systems.
A prevalent example is the blackout induced by cyberattacks on smart grids, which occurred several times in Europe and the United States over the past decade.
Distributed systems are susceptible to cyber-spies, insider threats, and other forms of attacks. Insider attacks pose a significant threat, as insiders may manipulate medical devices or disrupt wireless signals crucial for device functionality.
Remote vehicle control poses a significant concern, as attackers could potentially hijack vehicles, leading to catastrophic accidents on the road.
Various physical threats and attacks have been documented across CPS applications, including the following:
i) In 2006, a water filtering plant computer in Pennsylvania (USA) was hacked, serving as a conduit for spam and pirated software distribution.
ii) The Davis-Besse power plant in Ohio faced disruptions due to machines infected with the Slammer worm in January 2003.
iii) In 2000, the sewage control system of the Maroochy Shire Council in Queensland, Australia, fell victim to an assault orchestrated by a disgruntled ex-employee of the contractor firm responsible for building the system.
Challenges represent unanswered questions that necessitate further research for resolution.
a) Security by design: Many CPSs lack built-in security measures, primarily because they operate in isolated networks. Consequently, security considerations are often overlooked during the design phase. Emphasizing physical security becomes paramount for safeguarding CPS systems.
b) Cyber-physical security: CPS designers must adopt a holistic approach to security, integrating both cyber and physical aspects. This paradigm shift can enhance our ability to anticipate and counter cyber-attacks with tangible physical repercussions. A comprehensive cyber-physical solution is imperative, addressing previously overlooked vulnerabilities.
c) Real-time requirements: Timeliness is crucial in CPS, particularly during network attacks. Swift decision-making is essential to ensure system resilience. Security designs integrating cyber and physical elements enable practical risk assessment, threat detection, and resilient solutions.
Lightweight, hardware-based mechanisms layered atop cryptographic frameworks are essential for enhancing real-time interactions and meeting deadlines.
d) Uncoordinated changes: The diverse stakeholders involved in CPS necessitate effective management to navigate transitions smoothly. Coordination is essential to address the needs of various stakeholders and system components during upgrades or modifications.
Unplanned changes may introduce new vulnerabilities, compromising system security and necessitating collaborative efforts for mitigation.
a) Change management: IoT devices in ICS environments require meticulous management to prevent disruptions during updates or replacements. Careful planning is essential to mitigate potential issues arising from system updates. Coordinated change management is critical to tracking and preventing security-related alterations in ICS systems.
b) Malicious insider: Identifying and thwarting malicious insiders poses a significant challenge, as attacks originating from within an enterprise can be difficult to detect. Whether intentional or unintentional, insider threats underscore the importance of powerful security measures and vigilance in safeguarding ICS systems.
c) Secure integration: Integrating new components into legacy systems demands a cautious approach to prevent the introduction of new security vulnerabilities. Given the prevalence of outdated infrastructure in ICS, interim solutions are necessary to mitigate potential risks while transitioning to more secure alternatives.
a) Change management: Managing changes within smart grids presents distinctive challenges due to their complexity and the involvement of multiple stakeholders. Effective change management practices are indispensable for maintaining the integrity and functionality of smart grids.
b) Two-way communication: Smart grids’ two-way communication capabilities, facilitated by the advanced metering infrastructure (AMI), introduce vulnerabilities that physical attackers may exploit. Safeguarding these devices amidst increased connectivity is imperative for smart grid security.
c) Access control mechanisms: Robust access control mechanisms are essential for managing network, data, and device access within smart grids. Effective access control measures ensure proper oversight and authorization, particularly in emergency scenarios.
d) Privacy concerns: Addressing privacy concerns surrounding data usage is paramount as smart grids become ubiquitous. Encrypting customer data and implementing anonymization techniques safeguard sensitive information, mitigating the risk of privacy breaches.
e) Explicit trust: Establishing trust in sensed data and commands is crucial for preventing unauthorized access and data manipulation within smart grids. Detecting and mitigating FDI attacks requires innovative approaches customized to the unique challenges of smart grid infrastructures.
f) Comprehensive security: Implementing comprehensive security measures across all levels of smart grids is essential. Lightweight solutions and encryption mechanisms are vital for maintaining data integrity and confidentiality at every level.
a) Security versus usability: Balancing security and usability is essential to prevent critical situations where device functionality is compromised during emergencies. Ensuring timely access to essential functionalities while maintaining robust security measures is paramount for medical device safety.
b) Add-on security versus more code: Enhancing IMD security must be balanced against the potential increase in code size, which may impact device performance and cost. Lightweight cryptographic operations are necessary to bolster security without compromising device functionality.
c) Limited resources: Addressing resource constraints while implementing cryptographic mechanisms in medical devices is essential. Developing energy-efficient control mechanisms is vital to reducing battery drain and safeguarding against DoS attacks.
Traditionally, safeguarding control systems, especially SCADA, have focused on reliability, aiming to shield the system from random errors. Hence, a critical concern arises about how to find solutions for defending cyber-physical systems against malicious cyber-attacks.
Prevention: Many companies are implementing safety measures in their chemical, oil, gas, and water facilities. Proactively preventing attacks on medical devices is more effective than reacting to them after they occur. Initiatives like the NIST Guide to Industrial Control System (ICS) Security offer guidance on maintaining control system safety.
Additionally, standardizing communication between sensor networks enhances safety. Implementing confidentiality and integrity mechanisms in wireless communication devices enhances security.
Detection and Recovery: Detecting and responding to attacks are crucial aspects of security. Security engineers monitor network or computer system traces for signs of intrusion.
However, algorithms for identifying deception attacks on estimation and control algorithms are still underdeveloped. Research on human-computer interaction is challenging but essential for autonomous real-time decision-making algorithms.
New control theory approaches are necessary for developing autonomous and real-time detection and response algorithms for safety-critical applications.
Resilience: It is paramount to build resilient control systems capable of withstanding serious attacks. Redundancy and diversity are strategies to mitigate single points of failure and prevent corruption from a single attack method.
It is crucial to develop robust control and estimation algorithms that consider real-world attack models. Access control policies should integrate “what if” scenarios to anticipate potential threats.
Deterrence: Effective laws, law enforcement, and international partnerships can deter criminals, particularly those operating beyond national borders.
The past decade has witnessed a surge of innovative ideas spurred by technological advancements, such as edge computing and compressed data transmission. Cyber-physical systems have emerged as key enablers in various critical applications, performing complex tasks swiftly and efficiently.
This article highlights numerous challenges and pressing issues across different domains, such as industrial control, healthcare, and smart transportation. It also proposes potential solutions to address these challenges, aiming to bolster the security and functionality of CPS and control systems.
While many problems remain unsolved, there is consensus that future investigations focused on specific applications can enhance the security posture of CPS. This blog sheds light on crucial areas within computing, communication, and control technologies that warrant further exploration to shape the future of cyber-physical systems.
In summary, the ongoing development of cyber-physical systems promises to influence our lives far beyond just improving efficiency and safety. With its real-time functionality, expanded connectivity, and wide-ranging applications, CPS is poised to transform our interaction with the physical world, paving the way for a future characterized by unparalleled efficiency, safety, and interconnectedness.
Explore Sectrio’s solutions to harness the transformative potential of cyber-physical systems and usher in a future of unparalleled efficiency, safety, and connectivity. Join us in shaping the future of technology!
*** This is a Security Bloggers Network syndicated blog from Sectrio authored by Sectrio. Read the original post at: https://sectrio.com/blog/securing-cyber-physical-systems-in-2024/