In my previous post, I talked about why Console.log()
isn’t the most effective debugging tool. In this installment, we will do a bit of an about-face and discuss the ways in which Console.log()
is fantastic. Let’s break down some essential concepts and practices that can make your debugging life much easier and more productive.
As a side note, if you like the content of this and the other posts in this series, check out my Debugging book that covers this subject. If you have friends who are learning to code, I'd appreciate a reference to my Java Basics book. If you want to get back to Java after a while, check out my Java 8 to 21 book.
Front-end logging differs significantly from back-end logging, and understanding this distinction is crucial. Unlike back-end systems, where persistent logs are vital for monitoring and debugging, the fluid nature of front-end development introduces different challenges. When debugging backends, I’d often go for tracepoints which are far superior in that setting.
However, the front-end with its constant need to refresh, reload, contexts switch, etc. is a very different beast. In the front end, relying heavily on elaborate logging mechanisms can become cumbersome.
While tracepoints remain superior to basic print statements, the continuous testing and browser reloading in front-end workflows lessen their advantage. Moreover, features like logging to a file or structured ingestion are rarely useful in the browser, diminishing the need for a comprehensive logging framework.
However, using a logger is still considered best practice over the typical Console.log
for long-term logging… For short-term logging, Console.log
has some tricks up its sleeve.
One of the hidden gems of the browser console is its support for log levels, which is a significant step up from rudimentary print statements. The console provides five levels:
• log: Standard logging
• debug: Same as log but used for debugging purposes
• info: Informative messages, often rendered like log/debug
• warn: Warnings that might need attention
• error: Errors that have occurred
While log and debug can be indistinguishable, these levels allow for a more organized and filtered debugging experience. Browsers enable filtering the output based on these levels, mirroring the capabilities of server-side logging systems and allowing you to focus on relevant messages.
Front-end development allows for creative solutions, and logging is no exception. Using CSS styles in the console can make logs more visually distinct. By utilizing %c
in a console message, you can apply custom CSS:
console.customLog = function(msg) {
console.log("%c" + msg,"color:black;background:pink;font-family:system-ui;font-size:4rem;-webkit-text-stroke: 1px black;font-weight:bold")
}
console.customLog("Dazzle")
This approach is helpful when you need to make specific logs stand out or organize output visually. You can use multiple %c
substitutions to apply various styles to different parts of a log message.
The console.trace()
method can print a stack trace at a particular location, which can sometimes be helpful for understanding the flow of your code. However, due to JavaScript’s asynchronous behavior, stack traces aren’t always as straightforward as in back-end debugging. Still, in specific scenarios, such as synchronous code segments or event handling, it can be quite valuable.
Assertions in front-end code allow developers to enforce expectations and promote a “fail-fast” mentality. Using Console.assert()
, you can test conditions:
console.assert(x > 0, 'x must be greater than zero');
In the browser, a failed assertion appears as an error, similar to a console.error. An added benefit is that assertions can be stripped from production builds, removing any performance impact. This makes assertions a great tool for enforcing design contracts during development without compromising production efficiency.
Debugging often involves inspecting objects, and the copy(object)
method allows you to copy an object’s content to the clipboard for external use. This feature is useful when you need to transfer data or analyze it outside the browser.
The console.dir()
method provides a more detailed view of objects, showing their properties as you’d see in a debugger. This is particularly helpful for inspecting DOM elements or exploring API responses. Meanwhile, console.dirxml()
allows you to view objects as XML, which can be useful when debugging HTML structures.
Keeping track of how often a function is called or a code block is executed can be crucial. The console.count()
method tracks the number of times it’s invoked, helping you verify that functions are called as expected:
function myFunction() {
console.count('myFunction called');
}
You can reset the counter using console.countReset()
. This simple tool can help you catch performance issues or confirm the correct execution flow.
To prevent log clutter, use console groups to organize related messages. console.group()
starts a collapsible log section, and console.groupEnd()
closes it:
console.group('My Group');
console.log('Message 1');
console.log('Message 2');
console.groupEnd();
Grouping makes it easier to navigate complex logs and keeps your console clean.
Monitoring Functions: Chrome’s monitor()
method logs every call to a function, showing the arguments and enabling a method-tracing experience.
Monitoring Events: Using monitorEvents()
, you can log events on an element. This is useful for debugging UI interactions. For example, monitorEvents(window, 'mouseout')
logs only mouseout
events.
Querying Object Instances: queryObjects(Constructor)
lists all objects created with a specific constructor, giving you insights into memory usage and object instantiation.
Front-end debugging tools have come a long way. These tools provide a rich set of features that go far beyond simple console.log()
statements. From log levels and CSS styling to assertions and event monitoring, mastering these techniques can transform your debugging workflow.
If you read this post as part of my series, you will notice a big change in my attitude toward debugging when we reached the front end. Front-end debugging is very different when compared to back-end debugging. When debugging the backend, I’m vehemently against code changes for debugging (e.g. println debugging), but on the front end, this can be a reasonable hack. The change in environment justifies it. The short lifecycle, the single-user use case, and the risk is smaller.
While there are many transferrable skills we pick up while debugging, it’s important to remain flexible in our attitude. Next time, we will discuss networking and storage debugging on the front end.