CVE-2026-0866:畸形ZIP头可能导致恶意软件逃避EDR检测
嗯,用户让我用中文总结一下这篇文章的内容,控制在一百个字以内,而且不需要以“文章内容总结”或者“这篇文章”这样的开头。直接写文章描述即可。 首先,我需要通读整篇文章,抓住主要信息。文章讲的是一个新发现的漏洞,CVE-2026-0866,这个漏洞暴露了大多数杀毒软件和EDR工具在处理压缩文件时的一个盲点。攻击者通过破坏ZIP文件的元数据,创建所谓的“影子存档”,这些存档看起来是损坏的,但其实还能执行恶意代码。 接下来,我需要提炼关键点:漏洞名称、影响的工具类型、攻击手法、以及防御建议。然后把这些信息浓缩到100字以内。 要注意用词简洁明了,避免复杂的句子结构。同时,确保涵盖所有重要方面:攻击者如何利用漏洞、安全软件的问题、以及建议的安全措施。 最后,检查字数是否符合要求,并确保内容准确无误。 </think> 新漏洞CVE-2026-0866揭示了杀毒软件和EDR工具在处理压缩文件时的盲点。攻击者通过篡改ZIP元数据创建“影子存档”,使其看似损坏但实际仍可执行恶意代码。安全引擎过度依赖ZIP头信息导致检测失效。专家建议采用更积极的检测模式以应对此类威胁。 2026-3-10 02:15:34 Author: securityonline.info(查看原文) 阅读量:16 收藏

Shadow Archives CVE-2026-0866 MS-Agent Prompt Injection CVE-2026-2256 basic-ftp Path Traversal CVE-2026-27699 telnetd Root Vulnerability CVE-1999-0073 Regression USR-W610 Vulnerabilities End-of-Life IoT Security IceWarp Security Update IceWarp Vulnerabilities Airleader Master Vulnerability CVE-2026-1358 ZLAN5143D Vulnerability CISA ICS Advisory Acronis Cyber Protect Vulnerability CVE-2025-30411 WAGO 852 Vulnerability OT Network Security SandboxJS Vulnerability Sandbox Escape (CVSS 10.0) Kubernetes Local Path Provisioner CVE-2025-62878 CISA Unresponsive Vendors Avation & RISS Vulnerabilities KiloView Vulnerability CVE-2026-1453 OpenClaw RCE vulnerability Johnson Controls Vulnerability CVE-2025-26385 SandboxJS Vulnerability CVE-2026-23830 ibaPDA Vulnerability CVE-2025-14988 Protobuf Vulnerability CVE-2026-0994 AVEVA Process Optimization Vulnerability CVE-2025-61937 ConnectWise PSA Vulnerability CVE-2026-0695 Aruba VIA Vulnerability CVE-2025-37186 aiohttp v3.13.3, Denial of Service (DoS) SmarterMail RCE, CVE-2025-52691 Airoha RACE, Headphone Jacking HPE OneView RCE CVE-2025-37164 FreePBX Auth Bypass, PBX Takeover ScreenConnect Config Flaw, Untrusted Extensions Ruby SAML Auth Bypass, XML Parser Differential Devolutions SQL Injection, Password Manager Flaw Vivotek Unauthenticated RCE, EOL IP Camera Flaw Lynx+ Critical Flaw, Unauthenticated Reset Firebox Default Credentials, CVE-2025-59396 Veeder-Root RCE, Critical ATG Flaw ArcGIS Server SQLi Watchdoc RCE, CVE-2025-58384 Delta DIALink Daikin Security Gateway, authentication bypass Frostbyte10, industrial controller security SunPower, vulnerability Ubiquiti UniFi Connect, EV Station Vulnerabilities Adobe Experience Manager, RCE Vulnerability UniFi Access, Command Injection LDAPNightmare - CVE-2025-1316

A newly detailed vulnerability, CVE-2026-0866, is highlighting a fundamental blind spot in how many Antivirus (AV) and Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) tools handle compressed files. By strategically “breaking” the metadata of a ZIP archive, attackers can create “shadow archives” that appear corrupted to security scanners but remain fully functional for malicious execution.

The core of the issue lies in the trust that security engines place in ZIP metadata. Standard archives contain fields that declare the version, flags, and—crucially—the compression method used.

“Antivirus engines typically rely on this metadata to determine how to preprocess files before scanning”. When an attacker intentionally modifies the compression method field, the security software may fail to decompress the file correctly, leading to a false negative where the actual malicious payload remains unanalyzed.

While a tampered ZIP might thwart an EDR, it often confuses standard extraction tools as well. Utilities like 7-Zip or Python’s zipfile module may fail with “unsupported method” errors when encountering these malformed headers.

However, this doesn’t stop the malware. Attackers use custom-coded loaders to bypass the declared (and incorrect) metadata. As the CERT/CC note explains, “After antivirus evasion, the payload can be recovered by using a custom loader that ignores the declared Method field and instead decompresses embedded data directly”.

This technique allows malicious content to stay “hidden” from scanners while remaining programmatically recoverable for execution on the victim’s machine.

This vulnerability is a modern echo of older techniques, specifically drawing comparisons to CVE-2004-0935. While many security products will simply flag the file as “corrupted,” the lack of a full analysis means the specific threat remains unknown.

To successfully execute the hidden code, a user must still extract the archive or run a process that can handle the malformed data. While standard tools might not always reveal the payload, a specialized loader makes the concealed content a potent threat.

CERT/CC is calling on the cybersecurity industry to adopt more “aggressive detection modes”. Security scanners should no longer take archive headers at face value. Instead, they must:

  • Validate compression fields against the actual characteristics of the content.
  • Flag inconsistencies between metadata and data for deeper inspection.
  • Avoid sole reliance on declared metadata for determining how a file is handled.

Support Our Threat Intelligence

If you find our CVE report and cybersecurity news helpful, consider supporting our work.


文章来源: https://securityonline.info/cve-2026-0866-malformed-zip-headers-allow-malware-to-slip-past-edr-scanners/
如有侵权请联系:admin#unsafe.sh